000 | 02985nam a2200301 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | arcduce | ||
005 | 20120731113402.0 | ||
008 | 100408s2001 dcu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a0-8213-4932-5 | ||
040 | _aarcduce | ||
082 | _a338.954 | ||
090 |
_c16935 _d16935 |
||
100 | _aVedeld, Trond | ||
245 |
_aParticipation in project preparation : _blessons from World Bank - assisted projects in India _c/ Trond Vedeld |
||
260 |
_bWorld Bank _aWashington, D.C. _c2001 |
||
300 |
_aix, 64 p. : _bil. |
||
490 |
_aWorld Bank discussion paper _vno. 423 _x0259-210X |
||
504 | _aIncluye bibliografía | ||
505 | _aForeword -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Executive summary -- 1. Scope of the study -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Improvements in primary beneficiary participation -- 4. Impacts of beneficiary participation and social assessments on design -- 5. Participation in implementation: success stories from Andhra Pradesh -- 6. Shortcomings in achieving participation -- 7. In-country constraints to beneficiary participation -- 8. Institutional constraints and the role of the World Bank -- 9. Conclusions and operational recommendations -- Annexes -- List of boxes -- List of tables | ||
520 | _aThe study assesses the extent to which the India program, is meeting the Bank ' s objective of mainstreaming participatory approaches, in project preparation, and design. From a variety of social, and natural resource management sectors, ten projects were selected, appraised during 1990 and 1998, in which participation was an overall project objective. Key findings suggest that beneficiary participation was successful, contributing to participatory designs in many projects. Social assessments were used more often than before, while involvement of primary beneficiaries improved during the 1990s, reflecting a change in the ways of thinking of, both Bank staff, and Government officials. Participatory work improved significantly, showing a move from a focus on social mitigation of potentially adverse impacts, to proactive work, with broader operational frameworks for participation in project planning. Direct beneficiary participation, was less common in strategy, and policy formulation, but more common in formulating local-level project approaches, though the level of primary beneficiary participation, never went beyond information sharing, and consultation. However, there was an increased collaboration with primary stakeholders, and, capacity building, and empowerment did take place. The study stipulates the potential of beneficiaries is underutilized, and challenges participatory management, to improve processes so as to adapt to the social, and institutional context, and, to consider participation within a broader local capacity. | ||
648 | _a1990-1998 | ||
650 | _aPROYECTOS DE DESARROLLO | ||
650 | _aBANCO MUNDIAL | ||
651 | _aINDIA | ||
653 | _aBIRF | ||
710 | _aBanco Mundial | ||
942 |
_cLIBR _j338.954 V 48163 |
||
999 |
_c16905 _d16905 |