| 000 | 01894nam a22003137a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | arcduce | ||
| 005 | 20231030092054.0 | ||
| 008 | 121114s2000 at_||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aarcduce _carcduce |
||
| 082 | 0 |
_221 _a331.8817 |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_94185 _aMagnani, Elisabetta |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDid globalization reduce unionization? : _bevidence from U.S. manufacturing / _cElisabetta Magnani and David Prentice. |
| 260 |
_aBundoora, Vic. : _bLa Trobe University. School of Business, _c2000 |
||
| 300 | _a24 p. | ||
| 490 | 1 |
_aDiscussion papers ; _vno. A00.13 _x1441-3213 |
|
| 504 | _aBibliografía: p. 28-32. | ||
| 520 | 3 | _a How do globalization economic conditions affect labour market institutions such as unionism? We draw on recent theoretical and empirical work to yield a more comprehensive set of hypotheses related to the decline in unionisation. Furthermore, we extend recent theoretical work to highlight a direct role for competition (domestic and international) in determining unionisation. This paper uses a unique data set of U.S. three-digit manufacturing industries from 1972 to 1994 to test the hypothesis that domestic and international competition reduce unionisation. The main finding is that in spite of the importance of quasi-rents to explain unionisation, foreign and domestic competition are also significant determinants of unionisation. | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aINDUSTRIA DEL CEMENTO _94186 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aGLOBALIZACION _9612 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aSINDICATOS _92307 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPRODUCTIVIDAD DEL TRABAJO _92511 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aESTADOS UNIDOS _939 |
|
| 653 | _aINTERNACIONALIZACION | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_94120 _aPrentice, David |
|
| 830 | 0 |
_94108 _aDiscussion papers (La Trobe University. School of Business) _nSeries A _vno. 00.17 |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://www.latrobe.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/130873/2000.17.pdf | |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cDOCU _jF 331.8817 M 19748 |
||
| 945 |
_aBEA _c2012-11-14 |
||
| 999 |
_c23226 _d23226 |
||