000			02047nab a2200229 4500
999			_c28631 _d28631
003			arcduce
005			20200719204503.0
007			cr |||||||||||
008			200507s2006 |||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aarcduce _carcduce
100	1		_914556 _aFoster, John
245	1	0	_aWhy is economics not a complex systems science? _cJ. Foster. _h[recurso electrónico]
300			_a1 recurso en línea (22 p.)
520	3		_aIn 1898, Thorstein Veblen posed a fundamental question:" Why is economics not an evolutionary science?" Following dramatic advances in evolutionary biology in the latter half of the nineteenth century, this was a question that a number of economists were beginning to ask, including Alfred Marshall, one of the founding fathers of neoclassical economics.! While Veblen's insights led to the emergence of one of the two main strands of American institutional economics in the twentieth century, Joseph Schumpeter (1950) offered an" evolutionary economics" which had at its core entrepreneurship and innovation, both technological and organizational. However, despite the considerable influence of American institutionalism in the early decades of the twentieth century and the high profile of Schumpeter's writings, economics never became an" evolutionary science." The objective of this article is to argue that economics …
524			_aCómo citar éste artículo con Normas APA: John Foster (2006) Why Is Economics Not a Complex Systems Science?, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (4), 1069-1091, DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506975
526	0		_aBibliografía de la asignatura Metodología de la Economía. Licenciatura en Economía (plan 2009), 2do semestre.
650		4	_9459 _aECONOMIA EVOLUCIONISTA
773	0		_tJournal of Economic Issues. _gv. 40, n. 4 (dec. 2006), p. 1069-1091
856	4		_uhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfvNBXSbzeoAbwXKPHSt3x-dDOR0St47m8JGkd6vQY-NVjsiw/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1 _y Acceso al formulario para solicitar el artículo
942			_2ddc _cANAR
945			_aBEA _c2020-05-06