000 02233nab a2200277 4500
999 _c28635
_d28635
003 arcduce
005 20200707190332.0
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200507s2002 |||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aarcduce
_carcduce
100 1 _914558
_aDownward, Paul
245 1 0 _aCritical realism, empirical methods and inference :
_ba critical discussion
_cPaul Downward, John H. Finch, John Ramsay.
_h[recurso electrónico]
300 _a1 recurso en línea (20 p.)
520 3 _aThis paper reviews the critical realist critique of the methods of analysis adopted in neoclassical research and argues that there is scope for clearer guidance for economics researchers who wish to pursue empirical research in the critical realist tradition. It is argued that critical realist epistemology, derived from its open‐systems ontology, is unnecessarily dismissive in rejecting research methods that draw inferences from stable empirical regularities and patterns. The argument draws upon Keynes's philosophical explanations of decision‐making and probability, on behavioural and institutional explanations of emerging and stable institutions, and on inductive research techniques such as grounded theory, to establish a role for a plurality of quantitative and qualitative approaches to critical realist research.
524 _aCómo citar éste artículo con Normas APA: Downward, P., Finch, J. H., Ramsay, J. (2002). Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical disscusion. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (4), 481-500 recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/23602026
526 0 _aBibliografía de la asignatura Metodología de la Economía. Licenciatura en Economía (plan 2009), 2do semestre.
650 4 _91023
_aANALISIS ECONOMICO
650 4 _91665
_aKEYNESIANISMO
650 4 _91805
_aMETODOLOGIA ECONOMICA
653 4 _aTEORIA KEYNESIANA
700 1 _914801
_aFinch, John H.
773 0 _tCambridge Journal of Economics.
_gv. 26, n. 4, (July 2002) p. 481-500
856 4 _uhttps://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfvNBXSbzeoAbwXKPHSt3x-dDOR0St47m8JGkd6vQY-NVjsiw/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1
_yAcceso al formulario para solicitar el artículo
942 _2ddc
_cANAR
945 _aBEA
_c2002-05-07